|
The Family Steering Committee
Statement and Questions
Regarding
the 9/11 Commission Interview
with President Bush
Statement
and Questions 1-23 submitted February 16, 2004
Questions
24-39 submitted March 18, 2004
Before
an audience of the American people, the Commission must ask President
Bush in sworn testimony, the following questions:
|
|
Questions Column
|
Rating
boxes/ columns
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
|
1. As Commander-in-Chief on the morning of 9/11,
why didn’t you return immediately to Washington, DC or the National
Military Command Center once you became aware that America was under
attack? Not
happy about it
|
x
|
|
|
|
• At
specifically what time did you become aware that America was under
attack?
|
|
x
|
|
|
• Who
informed you of this fact?
|
|
x
|
|
|
2. On the morning of 9/11, who was in charge of our country while you
were away from the National Military Command Center? Were you informed
or consulted about all decisions made in your absence?
|
|
|
x
|
|
3. What defensive action did you personally order to protect our
nation during the crisis on September 11th?
|
|
x
|
|
|
• What
time were these orders given, and to whom?
|
|
x
|
|
|
• What
orders were carried out?
|
|
x
|
|
|
• What
was the result of such orders?
|
|
x
|
|
|
• Were
any such orders not carried out?
|
|
x
|
|
|
4. In your opinion, why was our nation so utterly unprepared for an
attack on our own soil?
|
|
|
x
|
|
5. U.S. Navy Captain Deborah Loewer, the Director of the White House
Situation Room, informed you of the first airliner hitting Tower One of
the World Trade Center before you entered the Emma E. Booker Elementary
School in Sarasota, Florida. Please explain the reason why you decided
to continue with the scheduled classroom visit, fifteen minutes after
learning the first hijacked airliner had hit the World Trade Center. Not happy about it
|
x
|
|
|
|
6. Is it normal procedure for the Director of the
White House Situation Room to travel with you?
|
|
|
x
|
|
• If so, please cite any prior examples of when this occurred.
|
|
|
x
|
|
• If not normal procedure, please explain the circumstances that led to
the White House Situation Room Director being asked to accompany you to
Florida during the week of September 11th.
|
|
|
x
|
|
7. What plan of action caused you to remain seated after Andrew Card
informed you that a second airliner had hit the second tower of the
World Trade Center and America was clearly under attack? Not happy about it
|
x
|
|
|
|
• Approximately how long
did you remain in the classroom after Card’s message?
|
X
|
|
|
|
8. At what time were you made aware that other planes were hijacked in
addition to Flight 11 and Flight 175?
|
|
|
x
|
|
• Who notified you?
|
|
|
X
|
|
• What was your course
of action as Commander-in-Chief of the United States?
|
|
|
X
|
|
9. Beginning with the transition period between the Clinton
administration and your own, and ending on 9/11/01, specifically what
information (either verbal or written) about terrorists, possible
attacks and targets, did you receive from any source?
This would include briefings or communications from
• Out-going Clinton officials
• CIA, FBI, NSA, DoD and other intelligence agencies
• Foreign intelligence, governments, dignitaries or envoys
• National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice
• Richard Clarke, former counterterrorism czar
|
X
|
|
|
|
10. Specifically, what did you learn from the
August 6, '01, PDB about the terrorist threat that was facing our
nation?
|
X
|
|
|
|
• Did
you request any follow-up action to take place?
|
X
|
|
|
|
• Did
you request any further report be developed and/or prepared?
|
X
|
|
|
|
11. As Commander-in-Chief, from May 1, 2001 until September 11, 2001,
did you receive any information from any intelligence agency official or
agent that UBL was planning to attack this nation on its own soil using
airplanes as weapons, targeting New York City landmarks during the week
of September 11, 2001 or on the actual day of September 11, 2001?
|
X
|
|
|
|
12. What defensive measures did you take in response to pre-9/11
warnings from eleven nations about a terrorist attack, many of which
cited an attack in the continental United States?
|
|
|
X
|
|
• Did
you prepare any directives in response to these actions?
|
|
|
X
|
|
• If
so, with what results?
|
|
|
X
|
|
13. As Commander-in-Chief from May 1, 2001 until September 11, 2001,
did you or any agent of the United States government carry out any
negotiations or talks with UBL, an agent of UBL, or al-Qaeda?
|
|
|
X
|
|
• During that same period, did you or any agent of the United
States government carry out any negotiations or talks with any foreign
government, its agents, or officials regarding UBL?
|
|
|
X
|
|
• If so, what resulted?
|
|
|
X
|
|
14. Your schedule for September 11, 2001 was in the public domain
since September 7, 2001. The Emma E. Booker School is only five miles
from the Bradenton Airport, so you, and therefore the children in the
classroom, might have been a target for the terrorists on 9/11. What was
the intention of the Secret Service in allowing you to remain in the
Emma E. Booker Elementary School, even though they were aware America
was under attack?
|
|
|
X
|
|
15. Please explain why you remained at the Sarasota, Florida,
Elementary School for a press conference after you had finished
listening to the children read, when as a terrorist target, your
presence potentially jeopardized the lives of the children?
|
|
|
X
|
|
16. What was the purpose of the several stops of
Air Force One on September 11th?
|
X
|
|
|
|
• Was Air Force One at any
time during the day of September 11th a target of the terrorists?
|
|
|
|
|
• Was Air Force One’s code
ever breached on September 11th?
|
|
|
|
|
17. Was there a reason for Air Force One lifting off without a
military escort, even after ample time had elapsed to allow military
jets to arrive?
|
|
|
X
|
|
18. What prompted your refusal to release the information regarding
foreign sponsorship of the terrorists, as illustrated in the
inaccessible 28 redacted pages in the Joint Intelligence Committee
Inquiry Report?
|
|
|
X
|
|
• What actions have you personally taken since 9/11 to thwart
foreign sponsorship of terrorism?
|
|
|
X
|
|
19. Who approved the flight of the bin Laden
family out of the United States when all commercial flights were
grounded, when there was time for only minimal questioning by the FBI,
and especially, when two of those same individuals had links to WAMY, a
charity suspected of funding terrorism?
|
|
X
|
|
|
• Why were bin Laden family
members granted that special privilege—a privilege not available to
American families whose loved ones were killed on 9/11?
|
|
|
X
|
|
20. Please explain why no one in any level of our government has yet
been held accountable for the countless failures leading up to and on
9/11?
|
|
|
X
|
|
21. Please comment on the fact that UBL’s profile on the FBI’s
Ten Most Wanted Fugitives poster does not include the 9/11 attacks.
|
|
|
X
|
|
• To your knowledge, when
was the last time any agent of our government had contact with UBL?
|
|
|
X
|
|
• If prior to 9/11, specifically what was the date of that
contact and what was the context of said meeting.
|
|
|
X
|
|
22. Do you continue to maintain that Saddam Hussein was linked to al
Qaeda?
|
|
X
|
|
|
• What proof do you
have of any connection between al-Qaeda and the Hussein regime?
|
|
X
|
|
|
23. Which individuals, governments, agencies, institutions, or groups
may have benefited from the attacks of 9/11? Please state
specifically how you think they have benefited.
|
|
|
X
|
|
24. After the first WTC building was struck, did you receive any
information directly or indirectly from the Secret Service agents
located in WTC 7?
|
|
|
X
|
|
• If so, what information did you receive?
|
|
|
X
|
|
• Did the Secret Service agents or anyone
else accompanying you attempt to call the New York City Secret Service
office for information?
|
|
|
X
|
|
• Did the Secret Service agents or anyone
else accompanying you attempt to call the Washington Secret Service
office?
|
|
|
X
|
|
• Who
provided you information, directly or indirectly & what exactly was
that information?
|
|
|
X
|
|
25. Please describe the role and influence of the President’s
Foreign Advisory Council in establishing the administration’s
counterterrorism policies.
|
|
|
X
|
|
26. In Feb 28, 2001, you released your economic blueprint and stated
"to improve INS' focus on
service and to reduce the delays in INS processing of immigration
applications, the administration proposes a universal 6-month standard
for processing all immigration applications." Prior to Sept.
11, 2001, did you or anyone else implement this processing goal in any
way? Were any directives, orders or policy guidelines given to INS
personnel relating to this issue by anyone?
www.whitehouse.gov/news/usbudget/blueprint/bud14.html
|
|
|
X
|
|
27. During the second presidential debate on Oct. 11, 2000, as a
Presidential candidate you responded to a question about racial
discrimination and said that " ...there
is other forms of racial profiling that goes on in America. Arab
Americans are racially profiled in what's called "secret evidence".
www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/election/2000debates/2ndebate3.html
|
|
|
X
|
|
28. On Feb 28, 2001, you issued a memorandum on racial profiling to
Attorney General Ashcroft, stating; "I
hereby direct you to review the use by Federal law enforcement
authorities of race as a factor in conducting stops, searches, and other
investigative procedures."
www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/02/20010228-1.html
To your knowledge, were directives or communications issued, through
Attorney General Ashcroft or anyone else, to any federal agencies, or to
any individuals or offices of any agencies, that concerned the racial
profiling Arabs or Muslims?
|
|
|
X
X
|
|
• Could prohibition of racial profiling have been a factor in
the FBI Headquarters personnel continually and “inexplicably”
throwing up “roadblocks” and even undermining the field agents’
“desperate efforts to obtain a FISA search warrant in the Moussaoui
investigation.” time.com/time/covers/1101020603/memo.html
|
|
|
X
|
|
29. In the first few weeks of the Bush administration it has been
reported that Andrew Card, Chief of Staff required that all regulations
(passed down by the Clinton administration) that had not yet been issued
had to be reviewed anew by an official appointed by the new
administration, generally, the department secretary.
www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/20010123-4.html
|
|
|
|
|
• Before adopting this blanket policy that
delayed the implementation of regulations, did anyone in your
administration have any concerns about delaying those that related to
security issues, such as National Security or aircraft/airport security?
|
|
|
X
|
|
• Was any special course of action taken
regarding these regulations?
|
|
|
X
|
|
30. In July, 2001, an executive order was issued which “blocks
all property and interests in property of the Taliban and prohibits
trade-related transactions by United States persons involving the
territory of Afghanistan controlled by the Taliban.”
www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/07/20010702-10.html
Please discuss the American government’s role and position, either
officially or unofficially in discussions/negotiations with the Taliban
in 2001 and their timing and appropriateness with respect to the
executive order of July 2, 2001 mentioned above. According to an article
in Salon, 6-05-02:
“The Bush White House stepped
up negotiations with the Taliban in 2001. When those talks stalled in
July, a Bush administration representative threatened the Taliban with
military reprisals if the government did not go along with American
demands.” www.salon.com/news/feature/2002/06/05/memo/index_np.html
|
|
|
X
X
X
|
|
• Who else was involved in those
discussions/negotiations?
|
|
|
X
|
|
• What was the outcome?
|
|
|
X
|
|
• What promises or threats were made?
|
|
|
X
|
|
31. Please discuss the National Security Presidential Directive
presented for your approval on September 9, 2001, which outlined plans
for attacking al Qaeda in Afghanistan.
|
|
|
|
|
"[Plans
had been drawn up by the] Clinton
administration to launch an attack on Al Qaeda in Afghanistan. Those
plans were shelved when Bush took office, but were revived and
accelerated in August 2001, following the breakdown of the pipeline
negotiations. By the beginning of September 2001, the war plans had been
approved by the Pentagon. On September 9 a National Security
Presidential Directive outlining plans for an attack the following
month, was presented to President Bush for approval."
www.pmdtc.org/docs/frnotices/66FR23310.PDF
jimpivonka.com/unpublished/forbiddentruthrev.html
www.guardian.co.uk/wtccrash/story/0,1300,556279,00.html
|
|
• Who else was involved in those
discussions/negotiations?
|
|
X
|
|
|
• What was the outcome?
|
|
X
|
|
|
• What promises or threats were made?
|
|
|
X
|
|
32. Please explain your 14 month opposition to the creation of an
independent commission to investigate 9/11 and your request to Senator
Daschle to quash such an investigation.
|
|
|
X
|
|
33. Please explain the reasoning which prompted the Executive Order
governing the release of Presidential Records, including those of
previous administrations, which could conceivably include historically
important documents pertinent to the September 11th
investigation. www.house.gov/reform/min/pdfs/pdf_inves/pdf_admin_records_let.pdf
|
|
|
X
|
|
34. When did you first become aware of “Rebuilding America’s
Defenses”( RAD) proposed by the New American Century’s (PNAC)? Who
introduced it to you?
|
|
|
X
|
|
35.
After September 11th, you seemed to have fully embraced the RAD plan.
Please comment on these observations:
|
|
"Bush has virtually used,
word for word, the written statements by PNAC members when he speaks
publicly about Iraq crisis” www.globalpolicy.org/security/issues/iraq/attack/2003/0227hellbent.htm
|
|
|
X
|
|
“Already we are seeing evidence of PNAC influence on U.S. policy. For
instance, the concept of "Homeland Defense" comes straight
from "RAD." Iran, Iraq and North Korea, nations that George
Bush calls the "Axis of Evil", are listed together in
"RAD" several times as possible military threats to the U.S.
There is a suggestion that military spending be increased to 3.8 percent
of the GDP, exactly the amount (over and above present expenses for the
Iraqi campaign) Bush has proposed for next year's budget. Its basic
statement of policy bespeaks and advocates the very essence of the idea
of preemptive engagement… Bush's National Security Strategy of
September 20, 2002, adopted PNAC ideas and emphasized a broadened
definition of preemption… There is even assertion of the necessity of
American political leadership overriding that of the U.N. (p. 11), a
policy that was sadly played out when the U.S. invaded Iraq without the
approval of either the U.N. or the international community.”
|
|
|
|
|
36. On February 29, 2004, the Seattle
Times ran this headline “U.S. changes tactics, adds forces in hunt
for bin Laden” and went on to say, “President
Bush has approved a plan to intensify the effort to capture or kill
Osama bin Laden…” Please explain why there has not been a
consistently intense push since September 11th to capture or kill bin
Laden. www.seattletimes.nwsource.com/text/2001867838_binladen29.html
|
|
|
X
|
|
37. Why was author, Bob Woodward, author of Bush at War permitted access to confidential PDBs while the Joint
Inquiry, and subsequently, the Commission, was not?
www.video.msnbc.com/id/4304339
www.fas.org/sgp/news/secrecy/2003/03/030403.html
|
|
|
X
|
|
38. Please explain why the White House has not demanded that the 19
recommendations made by the Joint Inquiry either be fully enacted or
discussed via hearings?
|
|
|
X
|
|
39. What type of federal rescue measures are in place in the event of
an attack on our nation, in terms of personnel and equipment?
|
|
|
X
|
|
Dick Cheney, Vice President of the United States
|
|
|
|
|
1. Please discuss the advice and plans of the Energy Advisory Council
specifically as they relate to pipeline development and gas/oil
exploration in Afghanistan, Iraq and other Middle Eastern countries, and
the feasibility of such development or exploration specifically in those
two countries in 2001. www.dcd.uscourts.gov/Opinions/2002/Bates/02-340.pdf
|
|
|
X
|
|
2., Please describe any discussions/negotiations between the Taliban
and either public or private agents prior to September 11th regarding
Osama bin Laden and/or rights to pass a pipeline through Afghanistan, or
any other subject pertaining to Afghanistan.
|
|
|
X
|
|
• Specifically, what were the discussions/negotiations about?
|
|
|
X
|
|
• Expand upon the discussions, agreements, or threatening remarks
that were reportedly made? www.salon.com/news/feature/2002/06/05/memo/index_np.html
www.guardian.co.uk/wtccrash/story/0,1300,556279,00.html
|
|
|
X
|
|
3. On the morning of September 11th, when did you first become aware
that America was under attack? Who informed you?
|
|
|
X
|
|
4. Besides ensuring the succession to the Presidency, is there a
defense protocol to follow in the event our nation is attacked? Was it
followed?
www.thebulletin.org/issues/2001/nd01/nd01schwartz.html
www.fas.org/irp/offdocs/pdd/fpc-65.htm
|
|
|
X
|
|
5. What subsequent actions did you take to defend our nation?
|
|
X
|
|
|
•Did you have open lines with the Secret Service, NORAD, the FAA and
DOD?
|
|
X
|
|
|
•Who was in the Situation Room with you?
|
|
X
|
|
|
•Was Secretary of Defense Rumsfeld or anyone at the Pentagon
informed that we were under attack? If so, at what time was the Pentagon
informed? If not Rumsfeld, who?
|
|
X
|
|
|
•Why wasn’t the Pentagon defended?
|
|
X
|
|
|
•Did you consult with President Bush about all decisions?
|
|
X
|
|
|
6. Was the order given to shoot down Flight 93?
|
X
|
|
|
|
7. Please explain your opposition to the creation of an independent
commission to investigate 9/11 and your request that Senator Daschle
quash an investigation.
|
|
|
X
|
|
8. The Hart Rudman Report was released in January, 2001, which
predicted a catastrophic terrorist attack within the United States. Yet
the White House apparently set aside the recommendations and announced
in May that you would study the issue of domestic terrorism. Apparently,
responsibility for dealing with the problem was then passed to the
Federal Emergency Management Agency Director, Joe Allbaugh. Congress had
been willing to support the recommendations. dir.salon.com/politics/feature/2001/09/12/bush/index.html
www.mipt.org/srchnatlstrat03272001c.asp
|
|
|
|
|
•In addressing the issue of domestic terrorism, which you were asked
to oversee by President Bush in May, 2001, whom did you consult and/or
from whom did you request briefings?
|
|
|
X
|
|
•What were your findings on the threat level?
|
|
|
X
|
|
•What recommendations for improved security resulted from your study
of domestic terrorism? When were they made and to whom?
|
|
|
X
|
|
•What coordinated plans of action, directives or protocols developed
as a result?
|
|
|
X
|
|
•Were those recommendations carried out following the September 11th
attacks? www.fema.gov/pdf/rrr/frp/frp2003.pdf
|
|
|
X
|
|
9. Why were the recommendations of the Hart Rudman Report ignored? dir.salon.com/politics/feature/2001/09/12/bush/index.html
|
|
|
X
|
|
10. Were you given Cipro on the evening of September 11? If so, why?
“At least some White House
personnel were given Cipro six weeks ago. White House officials won't
discuss that, or who might be receiving the anthrax-treating antibiotic
now…
On
the night of the Sept. 11 attacks, the White House Medical Office
dispensed Cipro to staff accompanying Vice President Dick Cheney as he
was secreted off to the safety of Camp David, and told them it was a
precaution, according to one person directly involved.” www.unansweredquestions.net/timeline/2001/ap102401.html
|
|
|
X
|
|
11. Please provide the names of anyone else who received Cipro in
advance of the anthrax attacks.
|
|
|
X
|
|
12. What level of support can the 9/11 Commission expect with regard
to enacting the changes that they recommend?
|
|
|
X
|
|
================================
Questions for National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice
================================
|
|
1. Beginning with the transition period between the Clinton and Bush
administrations, and ending on 9/11/01, specifically what information/
warnings about terrorists, planned attacks and targets had you received?
|
|
X
|
|
|
This would include briefings or communications from:
|
|
• outgoing Clinton officials
|
|
X
|
|
|
• the CIA, FBI, NSA and other
intelligence agencies
|
|
X
|
|
|
• foreign intelligence,
governments, dignitaries or envoys
|
|
|
X
|
|
• Former Senators Gary Hart and
Warren Rudman dir.salon.com/politics/feature/2001/09/12/bush/index.html
|
|
|
X
|
|
2. Please describe your role in the preparation of daily Presidential
Briefings. Did you ever summarize or revise the information provided by
the intelligence agencies?
|
|
|
X
|
|
3. Regarding the meeting of Abdullah Abdullah (close aide to Massoud
and now the Afghan Foreign Minister) in July , 2001, with “some top
National Security Council (NSC) and State Department officials,” what
information about al Qaeda did he convey? www.time.com/time/nation/printout/0,8816,333835,00.html
|
|
|
|
|
4. Specifically, what warnings did you receive from Sandy Berger and
the Clinton administration? www.time.com/time/magazine/article/subscriber/0,10987,1101020812-333890,00.html
|
|
X
|
|
|
5. After the revelation of the Aug 6th Presidential Daily Briefing
which warned that terrorists may hijack planes, you explained,
“It was an analytic report
that talked about UBL’s [bin Laden's] methods of operation, talked
about what he had done historically, in 1997, in 1998.
It
mentioned hijacking, but hijacking in the traditional sense and, in a
sense, said that the most important and most likely thing was that they
would take over an airliner, holding passengers and demand the release
of one of their operatives.” www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/05/16/rice.sept11
Comment:
Al Qaeda attacks have one goal--- killing as many people as possible,
usually in a spectacular way. Further, al Qaeda’s attacks are often
lethal, well-planned, simultaneous strikes against symbolic or
high-profile targets. Those characteristics are inconsistent with the
conclusion that the most likely scenario would be hijackings in the
traditional sense, especially when coupled with bin Laden’s
declaration in 1998 that "every
American should be a target for Muslims,” and that it is “the
duty of Muslims to confront, fight, and kill British and American
citizens.” www.cooperativeresearch.org/timeline/2002/bostonglobe052602.html
|
|
Please describe the analysis of al Qaeda methods of operation and what
bin Laden had done historically which led you to conclude that an al
Qaeda attack would be simple hijackings?
|
|
|
X
|
|
Questions For Dr. Rice from the Joint
Intelligence Committee
Inquiry Appendix
|
|
1. As stated in the Appendix of the Joint Inquiry of Congress’ Final
Report:
“Despite the White House decision [to deny access to the PDBs], the
Joint Inquiry was advised by Intelligence Community representatives of
the content of an August 2001 PDB item that is discussed in the report.
This glimpse into that PDB indicated the importance of such access:
*National Security Advisor Condoleezza Rice stated in a May 16, 2002
press briefing that, on August 6, 2001, the President’s Daily Brief
(PDB) included information about Bin Ladin’s methods of operation from
a historical perspective dating back to 1997. One of the methods was
that Bin Ladin might choose to hijack an airliner in order to hold
passengers hostage to gain release of one of their operatives. She
stated, however, that the report did not contain specific warning
information, but only a generalized warning, and did not contain
information that al-Qa’ida was discussing a particular planned attack
against a specific target at any specific time, place, or by any
specific method.” (Joint Inquiry Final Report, Appendix, "Access
Limitations Encountered by the Joint Inquiry," pages 1-2).
Ms. Rice can you reconcile this intimated discrepancy?
|
|
|
X
|
|
Terrorism as a Policy Priority
|
|
1. During your time as National Security Advisor, what priorities did
you establish for U.S. Intelligence priorities and where did terrorism
fit in?
|
|
|
X
|
|
• How did this change
from the priorities of the Clinton administration?
|
|
|
X
|
|
2. How were these priorities conveyed to the intelligence Community?
|
|
|
X
|
|
• Did the intelligence
Community propose any changes in priority with regard to
counterterrorism or al-Qa’ida?
|
|
|
X
|
|
• What were they?
|
|
|
X
|
|
3. Prior to September 11, who at the National Security Council and the
U.S. government played a leading role in setting counterterrorism
policy?
|
X
|
|
|
|
• Who else was involved
in this process? Please describe the process, the participants and the
fora.
|
|
X
|
|
|
4. Prior to September 11, did Congress support the NSC’s
counterterrorism efforts? Did Congress oppose NSC priorities related to
terrorism in any way? Please provide details of both, as appropriate.
|
|
X
|
|
|
5. Was Richard Clarke, the National Coordinator for counterterrorism,
included all in Principals’ meetings related to terrorism after
January 2002?
|
X
|
|
|
|
• If not, why not?
|
|
|
X
|
|
• How was it determined
who would be involved in such meetings?
|
|
|
X
|
|
• What was his role in
counterterrorism policy and intelligence prioritization after January
2002?
|
|
|
X
|
|
6. During the transition from the Clinton administration, did former
National Security Adviser Sandy Berger or other senior Clinton NSC
officials provide any advice, information, warning, or guidance
requiring policy, priorities, or threats from al-Qa’ida and Bin Ladin?
|
|
X
|
|
|
• If so, what was the
advice, information, warning, or guidance?
|
|
X
|
|
|
7. Prior to September 11, was the Administration engaged in a review
of counterterrorism policy?
|
|
X
|
|
|
• What issues were
identified for change?
|
|
X
|
|
|
• What stage were plans
in?
|
|
X
|
|
|
• What changes in the
role of the intelligence Community, if any, were planned?
|
|
X
|
|
|
• What happened to the
review after the September 11 attacks?
|
|
|
X
|
|
8. When the new Administration came into office, was it aware that
Usama bin Ladin had declared war on the United States in 1998?
|
|
|
X
|
|
• Who provided this
information, and how was it provided?
|
|
|
X
|
|
• What was the impact of
that fact on the Administration’s national security priorities?
|
|
|
X
|
|
• How did it affect the
intelligence Community’s posture?
|
|
|
|
|
9. Prior to September 11, did the President or other senior officials
in the administration make any public statements or give any speeches on
the subject of the threat of terrorism, or Usama bin Ladin’s terrorist
network in particular? If so, please make copies available to the (Joint
Inquiry Staff)?
|
|
|
|
|
Resources
|
|
1. Prior to September 11, did the Intelligence Community come to the
new Administration with any requests for additional counterterrorism
resources, e.g. additional funding? Who made the request, and what was
the nature of the proposal?
|
|
|
|
|
2. Did the Intelligence Community ask the Administration for more
resources to fight Usama bin Ladin and al-Qa’ida? Who made this
request?
|
|
|
|
|
3. Did the Intelligence Community ever cite a lack of resources as the
basis for not acting? If so, provide details and the NSC response.
|
|
|
|
|
4. When the DCI, Director of NSA, and FBI Director requested more
counterterrorism resources, what was the stated justification for their
requests?
|
|
|
|
|
5. What was the NSC’s response to each specific Intelligence
Community request for any increases in resources for counterterrorism?
For al-Qa’ida?
|
|
|
|
|
Agency responsiveness and support for policy makers
|
|
1. What specific strengths did you observe in intelligence collection,
analysis, and reporting on Bin Ladin, al-Qa’ida or terrorism in
general prior to September 11? What specific weaknesses? Please provide
specific examples of each.
|
|
|
X
|
|
2. What was the quality of intelligence received by the NSC? Did the
NSC make any efforts to improve this quality?
|
|
|
X
|
|
3. With respect to Intelligence Community counterterrorism efforts
prior
to September 11, how responsive were the CIA, the FBI, NSA, and DIA?
|
|
|
|
|
• Did they provide the President
and the National Security Council with the information needed to make
informed decisions?
|
|
|
|
|
• Did the agencies use their
authority aggressively? Did they cite limits or a lack of authority as a
basis for no action?
|
|
|
|
|
• Did they shift resources
appropriately in response to NSC direction?
|
|
|
|
|
• Did the NSC provide any
specific tasking to Intelligence Community agencies to which they did
not respond? Please provide specific examples.
|
|
|
|
|
Threat to the homeland
|
|
1. Prior to September 11, including especially spring/summer 2001,
what information did the Intelligence Community provide to the National
Security Council, orally or in writing, indicating the possibility of
terrorist attacks inside the United States?
|
|
X
|
|
|
2. Prior to September 11, what information did the Intelligence
Community provide to the National Security Council on al-Qa’ida
activities and infrastructure inside the United States?
|
|
X
|
|
|
3. Prior to September 11, did the National Security Council ever
consider alerting the American people to the internal threat from al-Qa’ida?
What happened?
|
|
|
X
|
|
4. Did the National Security Council ever consider enhancing U.S.
border controls, e.g., by strengthening watchlist programs, alerting the
FAA or the airlines, or inspecting cargo containers on a larger scale?
If so, what happened?
|
|
|
X
|
|
5. Prior to September 11, what was the National Security council’s
view regarding how well postured the FBI was with respect to combating
terrorist groups inside the United States? What steps were taken to
improve the FBI, if any?
|
|
|
X
|
|
6. Prior to September 11, did the Intelligence Community provide the
NSC with any information regarding the possibility that al-Qa’ida
members would use airplanes as weapons or hijack airplanes in the United
States? What did the NSC do in response to this information?
|
|
X
|
|
|
Foreign governments
|
|
1. Prior to September 11, which foreign governments were most and
least helpful regarding counterterrorism? How were they helpful or not
helpful in each case?
|
|
|
X
|
|
2. Prior to September 11, were the governments of Saudi Arabia and
Pakistan supportive of U.S. counterterrorism efforts? How responsive
were European allies? What priority was counterterrorism cooperation in
Saudi Arabia relative to military operations against Iraq, the Middle
East peace negotiations, and other concerns?
|
|
X
|
|
|
3. Did Intelligence Community agencies ask for NSC assistance in
getting foreign governments to take action against terrorist cells? Did
the NSC take any specific actions to support the Intelligence Community?
What did the NSC do? Did the NSC ask or instruct the State Department or
the Department of Defense to assist the intelligence Community in this
regard?
|
|
X
|
|
|
4. Prior to September 11, was there any discussion of increasing
information sharing and/or counterterrorism cooperation with the Sudan?
|
|
|
|
|
Use of Force/Overt and Covert
|
|
1. Prior to September 11, did the National Security Council consider
the use of military force against al-Qa’ida in Afghanistan? How? In
what form? Why was it not pursued? Was there sufficient intelligence to
support military options? Was their tasking to gain further intelligence
to support military operations?
|
X
|
|
|
|
2. Prior to September 11, did the National Security Council issue any
tasking to the CIA or the U.S. military to develop plans involving the
covert or overt use of force?
|
X
|
|
|
|
3. Prior to September 11, did the National Security Council ever
review the CIA’s authorities to conduct covert action against Bin
Ladin or al-Qa’ida? What problems were identified regarding existing
authorities, [-----------]? Were there any proposals to change those
authorities before September 11th? What steps were taken?
|
|
|
X
|
|
4. Prior to September 11, was the unarmed Predator flown in
Afghanistan after the Bush Administration came into office? Were
proposals made to the NSC to fly it? Which participants favored flying
it? If it was not flown, why not?
|
X
|
|
|
|
5. Did the National Security Council support the development of the
armed Predator? Did any administration official try to expedite the
process? Were any discussions held on this issue at the NSC? Who
participated?
|
X
|
|
|
|
6. Did you consider [------------]? Why or why not? What impact did
you expect?
|
|
|
|
|
7. Why was there no military response to the attack on the USS Cole?
Was this considered?
|
X
|
|
|
|
Recommendations
|
|
1. What recommendations would you make to improve the intelligence
community’s performance?
|
|
|
X
|
|
FSC Recommended List of Witnesses and Questions
Revised
March 18, 2004
Part 2: Intelligence
Central Intelligence Agency
George
Tenet, Director of the CIA
|
|
1. Why didn't the CIA share vital information about the terrorists
with the FBI?
|
|
|
X
|
|
2. Is the October 31, 2001 story by Le Figaro true which wrote of
Osama bin Laden meeting with a CIA officer in Dubai in July, 2001?
globalresearch.ca/articles/RIC111B.html
|
|
|
X
|
|
• If so, why wasn’t he taken into custody?
|
|
|
X
|
|
* Recommendation:
The Commission should contact Dr, Terry Callaway, the Canadian surgeon,
reported to have been treating Bin Laden at the Dubai hospital for a
kidney disorder, to request information about bin Laden’s medical
condition and about whether he is aware of a meeting between bin Laden
and a local CIA operative in July , 2001.
|
|
|
X
|
|
The
Commission should also interview that Dubai CIA operative who was
recalled to headquarters on July 15, 2001.
|
|
|
X
|
|
3. According Senator Ike Skelton (D- Missouri) in an interview on
National Public Radio on the morning of September 11th, 2001, you had
recently warned Congress of an imminent attack… “So this is not
entirely unexpected.”
www.thememoryhole.org/tenet-911.htm
|
|
|
X
|
|
•What intelligence prompted you to draw that conclusion?
|
|
X
|
|
|
•When was this information shared with Congress?
|
|
|
X
|
|
•Specifically, what information about an imminent attack was shared
with Congress?
|
|
|
X
|
|
•Was any of this information shared with any member of the National
Security Council?
|
|
X
|
|
|
· If so, when was it
shared?
|
|
X
|
|
|
·What information was
provided?
|
|
X
|
|
|
·Which members were
briefed?
|
|
X
|
|
|
• Was anyone at the National Security Agency, or any other
intelligence agency, or the Department of Defense briefed on this
information? If so, when?
|
|
|
X
|
|
4. Re: Mohammed Atta: It has been reported that Atta was on multiple
watch lists. How did he slip through CIA surveillance?
|
|
|
X
|
|
•Please produce a timeline of Atta’s travels
|
X
|
|
|
|
• Atta was in Portland, Maine on September 10, 2001. What was he
doing there?
|
|
X
|
|
|
5. Why weren’t all suspected terrorists and wanted terrorists placed
on watch lists to prevent them from entering our country? Why wasn’t
this information shared with the INS guarding our borders?
|
|
X
|
|
|
From
The Complete 9/11 Timeline, Part 2: Jan. 2001-Sept. 11, 2001 by Paul
Thompson:
“January 4, 2001: The FBI's
investigation into the USS Cole bombing learns that terrorist Khallad
bin Atash had been a principal planner of the bombing [AP, 9/21/02], and
that two other participants in the bombing had delivered money to bin
Atash at the time of the January 2000 meeting in Malaysia (see January
5-8, 2000). The FBI shares this information with the CIA, and when CIA
analysts reexamine pictures from the Malaysian meeting to learn more
about this, they find a picture of him standing next to hijacker Khalid
Almihdhar. [Congressional Intelligence Committee, 9/20/02, Newsweek,
6/2/02] The CIA is aware that Almihdhar entered the US a year earlier,
yet they don't attempt to find him. CNN later notes that at this point
the CIA at least "could have put Alhazmi and Almihdhar and all
others who attended the meeting in Malaysia on a watch list to be kept
out of this country. It was not done." [CNN, 6/4/02] More
incredibly, even bin Atash is not placed on the watch list at this time,
despite being labeled as the principal planner of the Cole bombing. [Los
Angeles Times, 9/22/02] ”
unansweredquestions.net/timeline/main/timelinebefore911.html
[excerpt from webpage]
|
|
6. Given the testimony in the trial in May, 2001 (below) were flight
schools advised to be vigilant for Middle Eastern men training to be
pilots and advised to report anything unusual? If not, please explain.
|
|
|
X
|
|
“MAY 29, 2001 Four men are
convicted in the bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania.
Witnesses testified at the trial that Osama bin Laden was sending al
Qaeda agents to the United States for flight-school training and
acquiring planes.”
www.cnn.com/2002/US/05/21/phoenix.memo/
[See sidebar—EXTRA INFORMATION, Timeline: Who Knew What and When?
Using yellow arrow, navigate to “May 29, 2001”]
|
|
7. What information did the CIA receive from foreign entities about al
Qaeda members, other potential terrorists, and plans to attack America
within the Continental United States? With whom in our government did
the CIA share this information?
|
|
|
X
|
|
8. Did any foreign intelligence agencies translate the September 10th
intercepts about tomorrow being the zero day prior to September 11th?
|
|
|
X
|
|
•If so, when did they communicate that information to our security
agencies?
|
|
|
X
|
|
•Who received that information?
|
|
|
X
|
|
•What did they do with it?
|
|
|
X
|
|
9. Did the CIA receive a translation of this communication or any
other communication which specified the date, plan or targets from any
source (foreign intelligence agency, foreign government, diplomat etc.?)
|
|
|
X
|
|
10. Considering the high volume of traffic and multiple warnings from
foreign governments, why didn’t the CIA anticipate and recommend
defensive measures to thwart the impending attack?
|
|
|
X
|
|
11. There were an extraordinarily large number of stock puts on
American and United airlines stock and others which were subsequently
impacted by the terrorist attack.
“It is well documented that the CIA has long monitored such trades
– in real time – as potential warnings of terrorist attacks and
other economic moves contrary to U.S. interests.
www.hereinreality.com/insidertrading.html
|
|
•Was the CIA monitoring the financial markets in the weeks preceding
September 11th? If so, via what system and/or software were the markets
monitored?
|
|
|
X
|
|
•Was such activity viewed as a warning of an impending attack?
|
|
|
X
|
|
•Did the CIA, in coordination with other agencies, both domestic and
abroad, investigate the purchasers of those stock puts?
|
|
|
X
|
|
•Please provide the names of those individuals, investment groups
and others who purchased the stock puts in question and the reasons they
gave for anticipating a drop in the stocks of companies which
coincidentally happened to have been severely impacted on September
11th.
|
|
|
X
|
|
12. Was our national security compromised by convicted spy Robert
Hanssen’s sale of Promis software to Russia?
|
|
|
X
|
|
13. How did Promis software end up in the hands of bin Laden? In what
ways could Promis be useful to al Qaeda?
www.unansweredquestions.org/timeline/2001/foxnews101601.html
|
|
|
X
|
|
14. Given that the attack was apparently known in the Muslim
community, (based on the following information) how is it that our
intelligence agents did not know of the impending attack?
• A Palestinian youth pointed to the Towers and indicated that they
wouldn’t be standing week www.msnbc.com/news/642164.asp#BODY
• members of a Brooklyn mosque were warned www.thedossier.ukonline.co.uk...
|
|
X
|
|
|
15. Please explain the role of the ISI, Pakistan's intelligence
agency, in aiding bin Laden and/or the al Qaeda from 1998 through the
present.
“Between 1980 and the end of
the Afghan/Soviet war in 1989, the CIA and Pakistan's ISI [Inter
Services Intelligence] recruited some 35,000 Muslim radicals join
Afghanistan's fight. The US and Saudi Arabia gave up to $40 billion
total to support the mujaheddin guerrilla fighters opposing the
Russians. Most of the money is managed by the ISI, Pakistan's
intelligence agency. At the same time, Osama bin Laden begins providing
financial, organizational, and engineering aid for the mujaheddin in
Afghanistan, with the advice and support of the Saudi royal family. The
CIA, the ISI and Osama continued to work together against the Soviets
until the end of the war."
pages.infinit.net/fmgoyeau/911pak02.html
|
|
|
X
|