|
Toward New Criminal Investigations into the Events of September 11
(Back to Main Document Overview) -- (Back to Index of Appendices) APPENDIX B7 TAXONOMY OF We understand that an exploration of which parties may be complicit in a political crime—such as 9/11 surely was, on a vast scale—must include due consideration for the question of "cui bono?": Who are the beneficiaries of given events? Benefits may accrue incidentally, unwanted, or unforeseen by the beneficiaries, and therefore benefit is insufficient in establishing culpability; but an impartial investigation necessarily will include consideration of possible culpability among beneficiary groups. Given the disturbing inconsistencies in the official story, such an investigation must ask, "Who would have had motive to allow or to facilitate the attacks?" "Who has displayed a willingness to exploit the events of 9/11 and their predictable consequences in the political, financial, and psychological realms?" "Are there indications that any of these beneficiaries may have been aware of the attacks in advance, or involved in obstruction of investigations either before or after the attacks?" (The "B"-Series is in development. Please see Updates.) For now we are pursuing the ideas presented by Catherine Austin Fitts in her article, "Cui bono?" Ø ( Forward to Appendix B8.)
Copyright (c) 2004 The "Justice for 9/11" Steering
Committee. |